Comments on: Locking up the wrong suspects

By: Fima Fimovich

Fima Fimovich — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:07:17 +0000

would like to send you some links to publications about my criminal
case. I was forced to confess to the
possession of internet digital pictures of porn in deleted clusters of
my computer hard drive. My browser was hijacked while I was browsing
the web. I was redirected to illegal sites against my will. Some
illegal pictures were found on my hard drive, recovering in
unallocated clusters, without dates of file creation/download.

I do not know how courts can widely press these charges on people to
convict them, while the whole Internet is a mess.

This is my story in inquisition21.com. There is all
information about case written by Irish writer Brian
Rothery. You can see a lot of violations of law by police

http://www.inquisition21.com/article~view~7~page_num~3.html

This is publication in Wired news

http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,63391,00.html

This is publication in Theregester

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/13/browser_hijacking_risks/

Article in Globe and Mail newspaper
http://ctv.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040617.gttwhijac17/tech/Technology/techBN/ctv-technology

Article in ZDnet
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5344831.html

This is article in Washington Times, May 22, 2004
There is information about my case.

http://www.cato.org/cgi-bin/scripts/printtech.cgi/dailys/05-30-04.html

Article in Crime research center:

http://www.crime-research.org/news/07.22.2004/506/

Article in Dallas, TX Newspaper

http://www.crime-research.org/news/24.12.2004/862/

Child porn law was declared unconstitutional in Hennepin County, Minnesota, USA’
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=11750

“I came here to the US as political refugee from the former Soviet
Union, and, now like many other people in the US, I feel shame that
all of this can happen in the US – supposed to be the greatest
democracy in the world.”

By: notimportant

notimportant — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:32:29 +0000

Jim is on trial for stating that he was given an honoury degree, when he could not provide evidence of this. His credentials as a forensic scientist are not under scrutiny and are widely respected by the Police. The reason the matter came to light was as a result of a campaigner from a certain survivors group looking for dirt on him to try to prevent him showing up Ore for what it was, lies. There is a lot of cash and funding at stake for these so called “charities” (campaign groups who swallow cash and achieve nothing,) if Jim and the other experts prove their case. At the end of the day what Jim has found has also been backed up by other yet to be disscredited experts, so it will stand up.

By: Iam007

Iam007 — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 06:00:29 +0000

I think you will find the charges relate to perjury and I don’t see a rush to re-open all the cases where Mr Bates worked on behalf of the prosecution! Strange as well in the circumstances where the CPS has even asked Mr Bates for assistance don’t you think?

It’s always a problem when you stand out from the crowd as you expose yourself to this situation and there are many that are desperate enough to do anything they can to discredit the REAL facts.

You are also correct in that DC’s older article had little impact but not the same situation now and it’s everywhere. The police have all but closed ranks as the outcome is not likely to be in their favour.

Cheers

By: me

me — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:19:41 +0000

Duncan Campbell has based much of his story in the Guardian and PCPro on evidence produced by Jim Bates who is currently on bail awaiting trial for offences of perjury and dishonesty.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6200454.stm

Duncan Campbell has previously posted a similar article on PCPro – but I don’t recall seeing that thousands of cases collapsed and hundreds of people being paid thousands in damages.

Still a story like that does help to sell a few more newspapers.